Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Preferences for learning different types of genome sequencing results among young breast cancer patients: Role of psychological and clinical factors.

Translational behavioral medicine - 29 Jan 2018

Kaphingst Kimberly A, Ivanovich Jennifer, Lyons Sarah, Biesecker Barbara, Dresser Rebecca, Elrick Ashley, Matsen Cindy, Goodman Melody

Abstract excerpt

The growing importance of genome sequencing means that patients will increasingly face decisions regarding what results they would like to learn. The present study examined psychological and clinical factors that might affect these preferences. 1,080 women diagnosed with breast cancer at age 40 or younger completed an online survey. We assessed their interest in learning various types of genome sequencing...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Age Factors
Share to Aged

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Aged, 80 and over

Share to Breast Neoplasms

Share to Decision Making

Share to Genetic Testing

Share to Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

Share to Learning

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 29385583
DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibx042
PMCID: PMC6065546

Genes

BRCA1

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-06.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Preferences for learning different types of genome sequencing results among young breast cancer patients: Role of psychological and clinical factors.PMID 29385583Read ↗

Preferences for the provision of whole genome sequencing services among young adults.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Quality of life drives patients' preferences for secondary findings from genomic sequencing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The breast cancer genetic testing experience: probing the potential utility of an online decision aid in risk perception and decision making.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Decision-making, attitudes, and understanding among patients and relatives invited to undergo genome sequencing in the 100,000 Genomes Project: A multisite survey studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Decision role preferences for return of results from genome sequencing amongst young breast cancer patients.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The Breast Cancer Genetic Testing Experience: Probing the Potential Utility of an Online Decision Aid in Risk Perception and Decision MakingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Interest in genetic testing for modest changes in breast cancer risk: implications for SNP testing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Psychosocial and Clinical Factors Associated with Family Communication of Cancer Genetic Test Results among Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer at a Young Age.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Factors Associated with Interest in Gene-Panel Testing and Risk Communication Preferences in Women from BRCA1/2 Negative Families.Semantic proximity Read ↗

What Research Participants Want to Know About Genetic Research Results: The Impact of “Genetic Exceptionalism”Semantic proximity Read ↗

Research Participants’ Preferences for Hypothetical Secondary Results from Genomic ResearchSemantic proximity Read ↗

“Is It Worth Knowing?” Focus Group Participants’ Perceived Utility of Genomic Preconception Carrier ScreeningSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.