Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Patient experience and utility of genetic information: a cross-sectional study among patients tested for cancer susceptibility and thrombophilia.

European journal of human genetics : EJHG - 1 Apr 2018

D'Andrea Elvira, Lagerberg Tyra, De Vito Corrado, Pitini Erica, Marzuillo Carolina, Massimi Azzurra, Vacchio Maria Rosaria, Grammatico Paola, Villari Paolo

Abstract excerpt

We evaluated whether genetic tests with evidence of clinical and personal utility (i.e. APC and BRCA1/2 tests) are associated with higher satisfaction and a more positive perception of care experience than those with undefined utility (i.e. tests for thrombophilia). A cross-sectional survey was performed through telephone interviews to patients tested for deleterious variants in APC or BRCA1/2 genes, or for...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Adolescent
Share to Aged

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Attitude

Share to Genetic Counseling

Share to Genetic Testing

Share to Neoplasms

Share to Patients

Share to Thrombophilia

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 29374276
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-017-0083-1
PMCID: PMC5891505

Genes

APC
BRCA1

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 3 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Patient experience and utility of genetic information: a cross-sectional study among patients tested for cancer susceptibility and thrombophilia.PMID 29374276Read ↗

Genetic testing and cancer risk management recommendations by physicians for at-risk relatives.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A Survey of Patients’ Experiences with the Cancer Genetic Counseling Process: Recommendations for Cancer Genetics ProgramsSemantic proximity Read ↗

A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Consent for Genetic Testing Using an Oncologist- or Genetic Counselor-Mediated Model of CareSemantic proximity Read ↗

Research participant perceptions of personal utility in disclosure of individual research results from genomic analysisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Using patient decision aids to inform decisions about cancer susceptibility genetic testing and risk management: A narrative review of impact and experienceSemantic proximity Read ↗

High-Risk Palliative Care Patients' Knowledge and Attitudes about Hereditary Cancer Testing and DNA Banking.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The Experiences and Needs of Individuals with a Variant of Uncertain Significance on Genetic Tests for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes:A Grounded Theory Study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical and psychological outcomes of receiving a variant of uncertain significance from multigene panel testing or genomic sequencing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic testing in cancer: a systematic review of patient reported measuresSemantic proximity Read ↗

A systematic review and meta-analysis of telephone vs in-person genetic counseling in BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic testing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Informational needs of individuals from families harboring BRCA pathogenic variants: A systematic review and content analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetics assessment at the end of life: suggestions for implementation in clinic and future research.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.