Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

A systematic review and meta-analysis of telephone vs in-person genetic counseling in BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic testing.

Journal of genetic counseling - 1 Apr 2021

Bracke Xavier, Roberts Jonathan, McVeigh Terri P

Abstract excerpt

Pathogenic variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes increase the risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Individuals with identified pathogenic variants in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene can benefit from cancer risk-reducing strategies. In the recent years, there has been an increase in the demand of genetic services. In light of the ongoing COVID19 pandemic, alternatives to face-to-face consultations have had to be considered...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to BRCA1 Protein
Share to BRCA2 Protein
Share to Breast Neoplasms

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to COVID-19

Share to Genes, BRCA1

Share to Genetic Counseling

Share to Ovarian Neoplasms

Share to SARS-CoV-2

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 33131182
DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1343

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

A systematic review and meta-analysis of telephone vs in-person genetic counseling in BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic testing.PMID 33131182Read ↗

Comparing Outcomes of Genetic Counseling Options in Breast and Ovarian Cancer: An Integrative Review .Semantic proximity Read ↗

Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone Delivery of BRCA1/2 Genetic Counseling Compared With In-Person Counseling: 1-Year Follow-Up.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Randomized noninferiority trial of telephone versus in-person genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Telephone genetic counseling for high-risk women undergoing BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing: rationale and development of a randomized controlled trial.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone vs In-Person Disclosure of Germline Cancer Genetic Test Results.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Telephone versus in-person genetic counseling for hereditary cancer risk: Patient predictors of differential outcomes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Preferences for in-person disclosure: Patients declining telephone disclosure characteristics and outcomes in the multicenter Communication Of GENetic Test Results by Telephone study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic counselor opinions of, and experiences with telephone communication of BRCA1/2 test resultsSemantic proximity Read ↗

A Randomized Hybrid Type I Effectiveness-Implementation Study of an eHealth Delivery Alternative for Cancer Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer (eREACH2): study protocolSemantic proximity Read ↗

Expanding access to BRCA1/2 genetic counseling with telephone delivery: a cluster randomized trial.Semantic proximity Read ↗

BRCA-DIRECT digital pathway for diagnostic germline genetic testing within a UK breast oncology setting: a randomised, non-inferiority trialSemantic proximity Read ↗

eREACH: A randomized trial of digital alternatives to genetic counseling for metastatic cancerSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.