Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Impact of Receiving Secondary Results from Genomic Research: A 12‐Month Longitudinal Study

22 Nov 2017

Abstract excerpt

The impact of returning secondary results from exome sequencing (ES) on patients/participants is important to understand as ES is increasingly utilized in clinical care and research. Participants were recruited from studies using ES and were separated into two arms: 107 who had ES and were offered the choice to learn secondary results (ES group) and 85 who had not yet had ES (No ES group). Questionnaires were...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Share to Genomics and Rare Diseases
Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 29168042
DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0172-x

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Impact of Receiving Secondary Results from Genomic Research: A 12‐Month Longitudinal StudyPMID 29168042Read ↗

Research Participants’ Preferences for Hypothetical Secondary Results from Genomic ResearchSemantic proximity Read ↗

Elective genomic sequencing for adults in research, clinical and commercial contextsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Psychological and behavioural impact of returning personal results from whole-genome sequencing: the HealthSeq project.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Patients' views on incidental findings from clinical exome sequencingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Additional findings from the 100,000 Genomes Project: A qualitative study of recipient perspectives.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The NextGen Study: patient motivation for participation in genome sequencing for carrier statusSemantic proximity Read ↗

Views of Genetics Health Professionals on the Return of Genomic ResultsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Predispositional genome sequencing in healthy adults: design, participant characteristics, and early outcomes of the PeopleSeq Consortium.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Engaging Adolescents and Young Adults in Decisions About Return of Genomic Research Results: a mixed-methods longitudinal clinical trial protocolSemantic proximity Read ↗

Healthcare professionals' experiences returning monogenic, polygenic, and integrated risk results in the eMERGE study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A Model for Genome-First Care: Returning Secondary Genomic Findings to Participants and Their Healthcare Providers in a Large Research CohortSemantic proximity Read ↗

Preferences of Italian patients for return of secondary findings from clinical genome/exome sequencingSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.