Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Psychological and behavioural impact of returning personal results from whole-genome sequencing: the HealthSeq project.

European journal of human genetics : EJHG - 1 Feb 2017

Sanderson Saskia C, Linderman Michael D, Suckiel Sabrina A, Zinberg Randi, Wasserstein Melissa, Kasarskis Andrew, Diaz George A, Schadt Eric E

Abstract excerpt

Providing ostensibly healthy individuals with personal results from whole-genome sequencing could lead to improved health and well-being via enhanced disease risk prediction, prevention, and diagnosis, but also poses practical and ethical challenges. Understanding how individuals react psychologically and behaviourally will be key in assessing the potential utility of personal whole-genome sequencing. We...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Adolescent
Share to Genetic Counseling

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Testing

Share to Genome, Human

Share to Patient Acceptance of Health Care

Share to Patients

Share to Sequence Analysis, DNA

Share to Truth Disclosure

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 28051073
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.178
PMCID: PMC5315514

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 3 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Psychological and behavioural impact of returning personal results from whole-genome sequencing: the HealthSeq project.PMID 28051073Read ↗

Impact of Receiving Secondary Results from Genomic Research: A 12‐Month Longitudinal StudySemantic proximity Read ↗

Predispositional genome sequencing in healthy adults: design, participant characteristics, and early outcomes of the PeopleSeq Consortium.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing researchSemantic proximity Read ↗

Elective genomic sequencing for adults in research, clinical and commercial contextsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Returning individual genomic results to population-based cohort study participants with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Patients' views on incidental findings from clinical exome sequencingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Assessing the implications of positive genomic screening results.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Revealing the results of whole-genome sequencing and whole-exome sequencing in research and clinical investigations: some ethical issues: Table 1Semantic proximity Read ↗

Who defines the “personal utility” of genetic and genomic testing? A systematic reviewSemantic proximity Read ↗

A collaborative translational research framework for evaluating and implementing the appropriate use of human genome sequencing to improve healthSemantic proximity Read ↗

Disclosing pathogenic genetic variants to research participants: quantifying an emerging ethical responsibility.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Decision-making, attitudes, and understanding among patients and relatives invited to undergo genome sequencing in the 100,000 Genomes Project: A multisite survey studySemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.