Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Finding the right coverage: the impact of coverage and sequence quality on single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping error rates.

Molecular ecology resources - 1 Jul 2016

Fountain Emily D, Pauli Jonathan N, Reid Brendan N, Palsbøll Per J, Peery M Zachariah

Abstract excerpt

Restriction-enzyme-based sequencing methods enable the genotyping of thousands of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) loci in nonmodel organisms. However, in contrast to traditional genetic markers, genotyping error rates in SNPs derived from restriction-enzyme-based methods remain largely unknown. Here, we estimated genotyping error rates in SNPs genotyped with double digest RAD sequencing from Mendelian...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Diagnostic Errors
Share to DNA Restriction Enzymes

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genotyping Techniques

Share to High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Share to Sequence Analysis, DNA

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 26946083
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12519

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Finding the right coverage: the impact of coverage and sequence quality on single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping error rates.PMID 26946083Read ↗

Evaluating the accuracy of variant calling methods using the frequency of parent-offspring genotype mismatch.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Coverage recommendation for genotyping analysis of highly heterologous species using next-generation sequencing technology.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A beginner's guide to low-coverage whole genome sequencing for population genomics.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Restriction site-associated DNA sequencing, genotyping error estimation and de novo assembly optimization for population genetic inference.Semantic proximity Read ↗

SNP discovery and genotyping for evolutionary genetics using RAD sequencing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimating genotype error rates from high-coverage next-generation sequence data.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Optimized double-digest genotyping by sequencing (ddGBS) method with high-density SNP markers and high genotyping accuracy for chickens.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Technical note: High fidelity of whole-genome amplified sheep (Ovis aries) deoxyribonucleic acid using a high-density single nucleotide polymorphism array-based genotyping platform.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Special features of RAD Sequencing data: implications for genotyping.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Double digest RADseq: an inexpensive method for de novo SNP discovery and genotyping in model and non-model species.Semantic proximity Read ↗

GBStools: A Unified Approach for Reduced Representation Sequencing and GenotypingSemantic proximity Read ↗

A bioinformatic pipeline for identifying informative SNP panels for parentage assignment from RADseq data.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.