Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of whole-genome (13X) and capture (87X) resequencing methods for SNP and genotype callings.

Animal genetics - 1 Feb 2015

Roux P F, Marthey S, Djari A, Moroldo M, Esquerré D, Estellé J, Klopp C, Lagarrigue S, Demeure O

Abstract excerpt

The number of polymorphisms identified with next-generation sequencing approaches depends directly on the sequencing depth and therefore on the experimental cost. Although higher levels of depth ensure more sensitive and more specific SNP calls, economic constraints limit the increase of depth fo...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Chickens
Share to Genome
Share to Genotype

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genotyping Techniques

Share to High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Share to Sequence Analysis, DNA

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 25515399
DOI: 10.1111/age.12248

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 4 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-25515399-2026-09-04.2. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-04.2.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 4 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of whole-genome (13X) and capture (87X) resequencing methods for SNP and genotype callings.PMID 25515399Read ↗

Variant detection sensitivity and biases in whole genome and exome sequencing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A comparison of BeadChip and WGS genotyping outputs using partial validation by sanger sequencing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Quantifying single nucleotide variant detection sensitivity in exome sequencing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Whole-genome sequencing approaches for conservation biology: Advantages, limitations and practical recommendations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Rapid multiplexed genotyping of simple tandem repeats using capture and high-throughput sequencing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Variant calling and genotyping accuracy of ddRAD-seq: Comparison with 20X WGS in layers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assessing single nucleotide variant detection and genotype calling on whole-genome sequenced individuals.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The application of deep learning for the classification of correct and incorrect SNP genotypes from whole-genome DNA sequencing pipelines.Semantic proximity Read ↗

SNP allele calling of Illumina Infinium Omni5-4 data using the butterfly method.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Efficiency of different strategies to mitigate ascertainment bias when using SNP panels in diversity studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Coverage recommendation for genotyping analysis of highly heterologous species using next-generation sequencing technology.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of Hybridization Capture Versus Amplicon-Based Methods for Whole-Exome Sequencing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.