Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Efficiency of different strategies to mitigate ascertainment bias when using SNP panels in diversity studies.

BMC genomics - 5 Jan 2018

Malomane Dorcus Kholofelo, Reimer Christian, Weigend Steffen, Weigend Annett, Sharifi Ahmad Reza, Simianer Henner

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels have been widely used to study genomic variations within and between populations. Methods of SNP discovery have been a matter of debate for their potential of introducing ascertainment bias, and genetic diversity results obtained from the SNP genotype data can be misleading. We used a total of 42 chicken populations where both individual genotyped array data...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Chickens
Share to Gene Frequency

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to MAF gene

Share to Genotyping Techniques

Share to Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Share to Sequence Analysis, DNA

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 29304727
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-017-4416-9
PMCID: PMC5756397

Genes

MAF

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Efficiency of different strategies to mitigate ascertainment bias when using SNP panels in diversity studies.PMID 29304727Read ↗

Assessing the effects of rare alleles and linkage disequilibrium on estimates of genetic diversity in the chicken populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

How array design creates SNP ascertainment bias.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Development and application of a 10 K low-density whole-genome SNP array for chickens.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Whole-genome sequence data uncover loss of genetic diversity due to selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Restriction site-associated DNA sequencing technologies as an alternative to low-density SNP chips for genomic selection: a simulation study in layer chickens.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Development of a high density 600K SNP genotyping array for chicken.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Conservation priority and run of homozygosity pattern assessment of global chicken genetic resources.Semantic proximity Read ↗

How imputation can mitigate SNP ascertainment Bias.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Large-scale genome-wide SNP analysis reveals the rugged (and ragged) landscape of global ancestry, phylogeny, and demographic history in chicken breeds.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic data for 78 chickens from 14 populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic diversity dynamics in conserved chicken populations are revealed by genome-wide SNPs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

SNP detection and prediction of variability between chicken lines using genome resequencing of DNA pools.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.