Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

A comparison of BeadChip and WGS genotyping outputs using partial validation by sanger sequencing.

BMC genomics - 10 Sept 2020

Danilov Kirill A, Nikogosov Dimitri A, Musienko Sergey V, Baranova Ancha V

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Head-to-head comparison of BeadChip and WGS/WES genotyping techniques for their precision is far from straightforward. A tool for validation of high-throughput genotyping calls such as Sanger sequencing is neither scalable nor practical for large-scale DNA processing. Here we report a cross-validation analysis of genotyping calls obtained via Illumina GSA BeadChip and WGS (Illumina HiSeq X Ten)...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Genome
Share to Genotype
Share to Genotyping Techniques

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 32912136
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-020-06919-x
PMCID: PMC7488117

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 3 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

A comparison of BeadChip and WGS genotyping outputs using partial validation by sanger sequencing.PMID 32912136Read ↗

Variant callers for next-generation sequencing data: a comparison study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Benchmarking HLA genotyping from whole genome sequencing across multiple sequencing technologiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

A pipeline for sample tagging of whole genome bisulfite sequencing data using genotypes of whole genome sequencing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Validation and assessment of variant calling pipelines for next-generation sequencing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Variant discovery in targeted resequencing using whole genome amplified DNA.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Reliability of genomic variants across different next-generation sequencing platforms and bioinformatic processing pipelines.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Sanger Validation of High-Throughput Sequencing in Genetic Diagnosis: Still the Best Practice?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Reducing INDEL calling errors in whole-genome and exome sequencing dataSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of variant callers using 60 532 multi-ancestry whole genome sequences.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Sanger validation of WGS variantsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Advancing human genotyping: The Infinium HTS iSelect Custom microarray panel (Rita) development study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Systematic Evaluation of Sanger Validation of Next-Generation Sequencing Variants.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.