Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

‘Hope for safe prenatal gene tests’. A content analysis of how the UK press media are reporting advances in non‐invasive prenatal testing

18 Sept 2014

Abstract excerpt

OBJECTIVE: To investigate how non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is portrayed in the UK press media. METHODS: Content analysis of the ten most widely circulated print/digital news sources in the UK. RESULTS: Seventy-nine articles were identified focusing on NIPT for Down syndrome (n = 67) including single gene disorders (n = 5), whole genome sequencing (n = 8), NIPT technology (n = 2), Rhesus D (n = 1) and...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Share to Genomics and Rare Diseases
Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 25233815
DOI: 10.1002/pd.4488

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 8 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

‘Hope for safe prenatal gene tests’. A content analysis of how the UK press media are reporting advances in non‐invasive prenatal testingPMID 25233815Read ↗

Non-Invasive Prenatal Genetic Testing: A Study of Public AttitudesSemantic proximity Read ↗

The ethical landscape(s) of non-invasive prenatal testing in England, France and Germany: findings from a comparative literature reviewSemantic proximity Read ↗

Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 1: should noninvasive DNA testing be the standard screening test for Down syndrome in all pregnant women?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Views and preferences for the implementation of non‐invasive prenatal diagnosis for single gene disorders from health professionals in the united kingdomSemantic proximity Read ↗

Motivations for Undertaking DNA Sequencing-Based Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Fetal Aneuploidy: A Qualitative Study with Early Adopter Patients in Hong KongSemantic proximity Read ↗

Ethical considerations in prenatal genomic testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

NIPT-based screening for Down syndrome and beyond: what do pregnant women think?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Non-Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis Using Cell-Free Fetal DNA Technology: Applications and ImplicationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Non-invasive prenatal testing in Germany: a unique ethical and policy landscapeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Public viewpoints on new non-invasive prenatal genetic testsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Non‐invasive prenatal diagnosis for single gene disorders: experience of patientsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Western Australian women's expectations for expanded NIPT —An online survey regarding NIPT for single gene, recessive and chromosomal conditionsSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.