Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

The ethical landscape(s) of non-invasive prenatal testing in England, France and Germany: findings from a comparative literature review

4 Oct 2021

Abstract excerpt

Since 2019, England, France and Germany have started offering NIPT as a publicly funded second-tier test for common chromosomal aneuploidies (trisomy 21, 18 and/or 13). Despite these benefits, the introduction of NIPT into routine prenatal care also raises a number of ethical concerns. In this paper, we analyse how these issues are discussed differently across countries, echoing the different socio-political...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Share to Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 34602609
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-00970-2

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 8 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

The ethical landscape(s) of non-invasive prenatal testing in England, France and Germany: findings from a comparative literature reviewPMID 34602609Read ↗

Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screeningSemantic proximity Read ↗

Non-invasive prenatal testing in Germany: a unique ethical and policy landscapeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evidence-based obstetric ethics and informed decision-making by pregnant women about invasive diagnosis after first-trimester assessment of risk for trisomy 21Semantic proximity Read ↗

Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening. Summary and recommendationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Ethical issues associated with prenatal screening using non‐invasive prenatal testing for sex chromosome aneuploidySemantic proximity Read ↗

Non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal chromosome abnormalities: review of clinical and ethical issuesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Ethical considerations in prenatal genomic testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Non-invasive prenatal testing: a revolutionary journey in prenatal testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

An easy test but a hard decision: ethical issues concerning non-invasive prenatal testing for autosomal recessive disordersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Position statement from the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis on the use of non‐invasive prenatal testing for the detection of fetal chromosomal conditions in singleton pregnanciesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Routes to expanded carrier screening in the UK: the perspectives of professional stakeholdersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Non-invasive prenatal testing: ethical issues exploredSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.