Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Western Australian women's expectations for expanded NIPT —An online survey regarding NIPT for single gene, recessive and chromosomal conditions

25 Apr 2023

Abstract excerpt

Prenatal screening has evolved rapidly following the introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), with screening now available for an increasing number of conditions. We explored the attitudes and expectations of women within the context of using NIPT to detect multiple different single gene and chromosome conditions during pregnancy. An online survey was used to assess these issues with a sample of 219...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Share to Parvovirus B19 Infection Studies
Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 37096445
DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1715

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Western Australian women's expectations for expanded NIPT —An online survey regarding NIPT for single gene, recessive and chromosomal conditionsPMID 37096445Read ↗

Patient attitudes and preferences about expanded noninvasive prenatal testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Views and preferences for the implementation of non‐invasive prenatal diagnosis for single gene disorders from health professionals in the united kingdomSemantic proximity Read ↗

Disparities in integrating non-invasive prenatal testing into antenatal healthcare in Australia: A survey of healthcare professionalsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Non‐invasive prenatal diagnosis for single gene disorders: experience of patientsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Obstetricians and gynecologists' practice and opinions of expanded carrier testing and noninvasive prenatal testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Australians’ views and experience of personal genomic testing: survey findings from the Genioz studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Defining ethical criteria to guide the expanded use of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS): Lessons about severity from preimplantation genetic testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Non-invasive prenatal testing for single gene disorders: exploring the ethicsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Public preferences for the value and implementation of genomic newborn screening: Insights from two discrete choice experiments in AustraliaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Client Views and Attitudes to Non‐Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis for Sickle Cell Disease, Thalassaemia and Cystic FibrosisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Expanded Carrier Screening in Chinese Population – A Survey on Views and Acceptance of Pregnant and Non-Pregnant WomenSemantic proximity Read ↗

NIPT-based screening for Down syndrome and beyond: what do pregnant women think?Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.