Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Non-Invasive Prenatal Genetic Testing: A Study of Public Attitudes

15 Nov 2011

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Non-invasive prenatal genetic diagnostic (NIPD) tests are being developed using cell-free fetal DNA in the maternal circulation. NIPD tests avoid or reduce the need for invasive diagnostic procedures for conditions like Down syndrome. Discussion of ethical and social implications of these techniques is increasing. We report findings from a study of public attitudes relevant to the...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Share to Ethics in Clinical Research
Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 22094262
DOI: 10.1159/000331254

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Non-Invasive Prenatal Genetic Testing: A Study of Public AttitudesPMID 22094262Read ↗

Public viewpoints on new non-invasive prenatal genetic testsSemantic proximity Read ↗

‘Hope for safe prenatal gene tests’. A content analysis of how the UK press media are reporting advances in non‐invasive prenatal testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

NIPT-based screening for Down syndrome and beyond: what do pregnant women think?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Views and preferences for the implementation of non‐invasive prenatal diagnosis for single gene disorders from health professionals in the united kingdomSemantic proximity Read ↗

Motivations for Undertaking DNA Sequencing-Based Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Fetal Aneuploidy: A Qualitative Study with Early Adopter Patients in Hong KongSemantic proximity Read ↗

Informed choice of pregnant women in prenatal screening tests for Down’s syndromeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 1: should noninvasive DNA testing be the standard screening test for Down syndrome in all pregnant women?Semantic proximity Read ↗

The ethical landscape(s) of non-invasive prenatal testing in England, France and Germany: findings from a comparative literature reviewSemantic proximity Read ↗

Non-invasive prenatal testing in Germany: a unique ethical and policy landscapeSemantic proximity Read ↗

The Influence of Experiential Knowledge and Societal Perceptions on Decision-Making Regarding Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)Semantic proximity Read ↗

Public, expert and patients' opinions on preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) in GermanySemantic proximity Read ↗

Attitudes of Israeli parents of children with Down syndrome toward non‐invasive prenatal screening and the scope of prenatal testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.