Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

NIPT-based screening for Down syndrome and beyond: what do pregnant women think?

19 Feb 2015

Abstract excerpt

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to study pregnant women's views on noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for Down syndrome and the potential to test for a broader range of conditions. METHODS: An online questionnaire available on the Dutch pregnancy fair website was completed by 381 pregnant women. RESULTS: Of the women, 51% expressed interest in having NIPT, including 33% of women who had declined...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Share to Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 25693726
DOI: 10.1002/pd.4579

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 8 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

NIPT-based screening for Down syndrome and beyond: what do pregnant women think?PMID 25693726Read ↗

Decision-Making Process about Prenatal Genetic Screening: How deeply do Moms-to-Be Want to Know from Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Patient attitudes and preferences about expanded noninvasive prenatal testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

‘Hope for safe prenatal gene tests’. A content analysis of how the UK press media are reporting advances in non‐invasive prenatal testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 1: should noninvasive DNA testing be the standard screening test for Down syndrome in all pregnant women?Semantic proximity Read ↗

First‐trimester Down syndrome screening: pregnant women's knowledgeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Obstetricians and gynecologists' practice and opinions of expanded carrier testing and noninvasive prenatal testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Attitudes of Israeli parents of children with Down syndrome toward non‐invasive prenatal screening and the scope of prenatal testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Western Australian women's expectations for expanded NIPT —An online survey regarding NIPT for single gene, recessive and chromosomal conditionsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Do women know that prenatal testing detects fetuses with Down syndrome?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Informed choice of pregnant women in prenatal screening tests for Down’s syndromeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Does non‐invasive prenatal testing affect the livebirth prevalence of Down syndrome in the Netherlands? A population‐based register studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Non-Invasive Prenatal Genetic Testing: A Study of Public AttitudesSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.