Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Genome scan methods against more complex models: when and how much should we trust them?

Molecular ecology - 1 Apr 2014

de Villemereuil Pierre, Frichot Éric, Bazin Éric, François Olivier, Gaggiotti Oscar E

Abstract excerpt

The recent availability of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has made possible the use of dense genetic markers to identify regions of the genome that may be under the influence of selection. Several statistical methods have been developed recently for this purpose. Here, we present the results of an individual-based simulation study investigating the power and error rate of popular or recent genome scan methods:...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Bayes Theorem
Share to Computer Simulation
Share to Data Interpretation, Statistical

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Gene-Environment Interaction

Share to Gene Frequency

Share to Genetics, Population

Share to Linear Models

Share to Models, Genetic

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 24611968
DOI: 10.1111/mec.12705

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-06.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Genome scan methods against more complex models: when and how much should we trust them?PMID 24611968Read ↗

Using gene genealogies to localize rare variants associated with complex traits in diploid populationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genome scans for detecting footprints of local adaptation using a Bayesian factor model.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Selection and explosive growth may hamper the performance of rare variant association testsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Using Gene Genealogies to Localize Rare Variants Associated with Complex Traits in Diploid Populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Complex system approaches to genetic analysis Bayesian approaches.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A hierarchical Bayesian model for next-generation population genomics.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Scaling probabilistic models of genetic variation to millions of humans.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Effects of Gene Action, Marker Density, and Timing of Selection on the Performance of Landscape Genomic Scans of Local Adaptation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A comprehensive analysis comparing linear and generalized linear models in detecting adaptive SNPs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genome-wide significance for dense SNP and resequencing data.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Controlling false discoveries in genome scans for selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Detecting selection in population trees: the Lewontin and Krakauer test extended.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.