Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Modeling one complete versus triplicate analyses in low template DNA typing.

International journal of legal medicine - 1 Mar 2014

Ge Jianye, Budowle Bruce

Abstract excerpt

There are generally two strategies for low template DNA typing: the complete strategy, which uses all available DNA in a single PCR and subsequent typing, and the consensus strategy, in which the biological sample is divided into two or more aliquots and the genotype profile is determined by consensus from these "replicates." In this study, the consensus and complete strategies are compared by a statistical...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Consensus Sequence
Share to DNA Fingerprinting
Share to Genetic Loci

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Models, Statistical

Share to Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction

Share to Probability

Share to Segmental Duplications, Genomic

Share to Templates, Genetic

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 24096959
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-013-0924-6

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Modeling one complete versus triplicate analyses in low template DNA typing.PMID 24096959Read ↗

Analysis of allelic drop-out using the Identifiler(®) and PowerPlex(®) 16 forensic STR typing systems.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Low template STR typing: effect of replicate number and consensus method on genotyping reliability and DNA database search results.Semantic proximity Read ↗

An investigation of the robustness of the consensus method of interpreting low-template DNA profiles.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Precision DNA Mixture Interpretation with Single-Cell Profiling.Semantic proximity Read ↗

An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.Semantic proximity Read ↗

DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the evaluation of STR typing results that may include drop-out and/or drop-in using probabilistic methods.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimating the probability of allelic drop-out of STR alleles in forensic genetics.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Calculating the weight of evidence in low-template forensic DNA casework.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A universal strategy to interpret DNA profiles that does not require a definition of low-copy-number.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Establishing the Limits of TrueAllele® Casework: A Validation Study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

TrueAllele(®) Genotype Identification on DNA Mixtures Containing up to Five Unknown Contributors.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Allelic drop-out probabilities estimated by logistic regression--further considerations and practical implementation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.