Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Establishing the Limits of TrueAllele® Casework: A Validation Study.

Journal of forensic sciences - 1 Sept 2015

Greenspoon Susan A, Schiermeier-Wood Lisa, Jenkins Brad C

Abstract excerpt

The limits of the expert system, TrueAllele® Casework (TA), were explored using challenging mock casework profiles that included 17 single-source and 18 two-, 15 three- and 7 four-person DNA mixtures. The sensitivity (ability to detect a minor contributor) of the TA analysis process was examined...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to DNA
Share to DNA Fingerprinting
Share to Genotype

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Likelihood Functions

Share to Models, Statistical

Share to Sensitivity and Specificity

Share to Software

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 26258391
DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.12810

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 4 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-26258391-2026-09-04.2. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-04.2.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 4 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Establishing the Limits of TrueAllele® Casework: A Validation Study.PMID 26258391Read ↗

TrueAllele(®) Genotype Identification on DNA Mixtures Containing up to Five Unknown Contributors.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A tale of two PG systems: A comparison of the two most widely used continuous probabilistic genotyping systems in the United States.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Decreased accuracy of forensic DNA mixture analysis for groups with lower genetic diversitySemantic proximity Read ↗

An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimating the probability of allelic drop-out of STR alleles in forensic genetics.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Investigation into the effect of mixtures comprising related people on non-donor likelihood ratios, and potential practises to mitigate providing misleading opinions.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Uncertainty in probabilistic genotyping of low template DNA: A case study comparing STRMix™ and TrueAllele™.Semantic proximity Read ↗

New York State TrueAllele ® casework validation study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimating the number of contributors to two-, three-, and four-person mixtures containing DNA in high template and low template amounts.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Validating TrueAllele® DNA mixture interpretation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Modeling one complete versus triplicate analyses in low template DNA typing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of mock cases involving complex low template DNA mixtures: A descriptive study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.