Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Short communication: genomic evaluations of final score for US Holsteins benefit from the inclusion of genotypes on cows.

Journal of dairy science - 1 May 2013

Tsuruta S, Misztal I, Lawlor T J

Abstract excerpt

Currently, the US Department of Agriculture Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory utilizes a multi-step procedure in genomic evaluations for US Holstein bulls and cows, with adjustments for cows. We used a single-step procedure to investigate whether adding cows' genotypes could increase reliability in genomic breeding values for bulls while minimizing bias. The first data set to 2007 was used to calculate...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breeding
Share to Cattle
Share to Genotype

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Pedigree

Share to Quantitative Trait, Heritable

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 23477821
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-6272

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Short communication: genomic evaluations of final score for US Holsteins benefit from the inclusion of genotypes on cows.PMID 23477821Read ↗

Multiple-trait genomic evaluation of linear type traits using genomic and phenotypic data in US Holsteins.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assigning unknown parent groups to reduce bias in genomic evaluations of final score in US Holsteins.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Short communication: Analysis of genomic predictor population for Holstein dairy cattle in the United States--Effects of sex and age.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Application of single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction with a multiple-lactation random regression test-day model for Japanese Holsteins.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Short communication: Improving accuracy of predicting breeding values in Brazilian Holstein population by adding data from Nordic and French Holstein populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Technical note: adjustment of all cow evaluations for yield traits to be comparable with bull evaluations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic predictions for yield traits in US Holsteins with unknown parent groups.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.