Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score.

Journal of dairy science - 1 Feb 2010

Aguilar I, Misztal I, Johnson D L, Legarra A, Tsuruta S, Lawlor T J

Abstract excerpt

The first national single-step, full-information (phenotype, pedigree, and marker genotype) genetic evaluation was developed for final score of US Holsteins. Data included final scores recorded from 1955 to 2009 for 6,232,548 Holsteins cows. BovineSNP50 (Illumina, San Diego, CA) genotypes from th...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breeding
Share to Cattle
Share to Dairying

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genome

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Pedigree

Share to Phenotype

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 20105546
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2009-2730

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-20105546-2026-09-02.2. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-02.2.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score.PMID 20105546Read ↗

Multiple-trait genomic evaluation of linear type traits using genomic and phenotypic data in US Holsteins.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Short communication: genomic evaluations of final score for US Holsteins benefit from the inclusion of genotypes on cows.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Implementation of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor for US Holsteins with a large number of genotyped animals.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Application of single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction with a multiple-lactation random regression test-day model for Japanese Holsteins.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The genomic evaluation system in the United States: past, present, future.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Application of multivariate single-step SNP best linear unbiased predictor model and revised SNP list for genomic evaluation of dairy cattle in Australia.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic Selection in Dairy Cattle: The USDA Experience.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Short communication: Analysis of genomic predictor population for Holstein dairy cattle in the United States--Effects of sex and age.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Single-step SNPBLUP evaluation in six German beef cattle breeds.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.