Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.

Journal of dairy science - 1 Jun 2018

Masuda Y, VanRaden P M, Misztal I, Lawlor T J

Abstract excerpt

The objective of this study was to compare genetic trends from single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) and traditional BLUP models for milk production traits of US Holsteins. Phenotypes were 305-d milk, fat, and protein yields from 21,527,040 cows recorded between January 1990 and August 2015. The pedigree file included 29,651,623 animals and was limited to 3 generations back from recorded or genotyped animals....

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breeding
Share to Cattle
Share to Genome

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genomics

Share to Lactation

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Pedigree

Share to Pregnancy

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 29573806
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13310

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.PMID 29573806Read ↗

Changes in genetic trends in US dairy cattle since the implementation of genomic selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Short communication: genomic evaluations of final score for US Holsteins benefit from the inclusion of genotypes on cows.Semantic proximity Read ↗

All-breed single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor evaluations for fertility traits in US dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Application of multivariate single-step SNP best linear unbiased predictor model and revised SNP list for genomic evaluation of dairy cattle in Australia.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Multiple-trait genomic evaluation of linear type traits using genomic and phenotypic data in US Holsteins.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic predictions for yield traits in US Holsteins with unknown parent groups.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Symposium review: Single-step genomic evaluations in dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Hot topic: Use of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) with a large number of genotypes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Short communication: Analysis of genomic predictor population for Holstein dairy cattle in the United States--Effects of sex and age.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Improving Breeding Value Reliability with Genomic Data in Breeding Groups of Charolais.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.