Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.

Journal of dairy science - 1 Sept 2018

Guarini A R, Lourenco D A L, Brito L F, Sargolzaei M, Baes C F, Miglior F, Misztal I, Schenkel F S

Abstract excerpt

The success and sustainability of a breeding program incorporating genomic information is largely dependent on the accuracy of predictions. For low heritability traits, large training populations are required to achieve high accuracies of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV). By including genotyped and nongenotyped animals simultaneously in the evaluation, the single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) approach has...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breeding
Share to Canada

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Cattle

Share to Genome

Share to Genomics

Share to Genotype

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Reproducibility of Results

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 29935829
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-14193

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.PMID 29935829Read ↗

The prediction accuracies of linear-type traits in Czech Holstein cattle when using ssGBLUP or wssGBLUP.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Short communication: genomic evaluations of final score for US Holsteins benefit from the inclusion of genotypes on cows.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A computationally efficient method for approximating reliabilities in large-scale single-step genomic prediction.Semantic proximity Read ↗

All-breed single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor evaluations for fertility traits in US dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic prediction in Brazilian Guzerá cattle: application of a single-step approach to productive and reproductive traits.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) effectively models small cattle populations: lessons from the Israeli-Holstein Herdbook.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Indirect genomic predictions for milk yield in crossbred Holstein-Jersey dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison on genomic predictions using three GBLUP methods and two single-step blending methods in the Nordic Holstein population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Single-Step Genomic Evaluations from Theory to Practice: Using SNP Chips and Sequence Data in BLUPF90.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Improving Breeding Value Reliability with Genomic Data in Breeding Groups of Charolais.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Marker effect p-values for single-step SNP-BLUP genomic modelsSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.