Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Technical note: adjustment of all cow evaluations for yield traits to be comparable with bull evaluations.

Journal of dairy science - 1 Jun 2012

Wiggans G R, Vanraden P M, Cooper T A

Abstract excerpt

Traditional evaluations of cows with genotypes have been adjusted since April 2010 to be comparable with evaluations of bulls so that their value for estimation of single nucleotide polymorphism effects in genomic evaluation programs would be improved. However, that adjustment made them not comparable with traditional evaluations of nongenotyped cows. To create an adjustment for all cows with an evaluation based...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breeding
Share to Cattle
Share to REL gene

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genomics

Share to Genotype

Share to Lactation

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Quantitative Trait, Heritable

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 22612979
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-5000

Genes

REL

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Technical note: adjustment of all cow evaluations for yield traits to be comparable with bull evaluations.PMID 22612979Read ↗

Technical note: adjustment of traditional cow evaluations to improve accuracy of genomic predictions.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Short communication: genomic evaluations of final score for US Holsteins benefit from the inclusion of genotypes on cows.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The genomic evaluation system in the United States: past, present, future.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Using genomics to enhance selection of novel traits in North American dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Multiple-trait genomic evaluation of linear type traits using genomic and phenotypic data in US Holsteins.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Changes in genetic trends in US dairy cattle since the implementation of genomic selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Invited review: The future of selection decisions and breeding programs: What are we breeding for, and who decides?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Multibreed genomic evaluations using purebred Holsteins, Jerseys, and Brown Swiss.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Heritabilities and genetic correlations in the same traits across different strata of herds created according to continuous genomic, genetic, and phenotypic descriptors.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Technical note: Rapid calculation of genomic evaluations for new animals.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.