Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Genomic imputation and evaluation using high-density Holstein genotypes.

Journal of dairy science - 1 Jan 2013

VanRaden P M, Null D J, Sargolzaei M, Wiggans G R, Tooker M E, Cole J B, Sonstegard T S, Connor E E, Winters M, van Kaam J B C H M, Valentini A, Van Doormaal B J, Faust M A, Doak G A

Abstract excerpt

Genomic evaluations for 161,341 Holsteins were computed by using 311,725 of 777,962 markers on the Illumina BovineHD Genotyping BeadChip (HD). Initial edits with 1,741 HD genotypes from 5 breeds revealed that 636,967 markers were usable but that half were redundant. Holstein genotypes were from 1,510 animals with HD markers, 82,358 animals with 45,187 (50K) markers, 1,797 animals with 8,031 (8K) markers, 20,177...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breeding
Share to Cattle

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Markers

Share to Genomics

Share to Genotype

Share to Phenotype

Share to Quantitative Trait, Heritable

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 23063157
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-5702

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Genomic imputation and evaluation using high-density Holstein genotypes.PMID 23063157Read ↗

Reliability of genomic prediction for German Holsteins using imputed genotypes from low-density chips.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Marker selection and genomic prediction of economically important traits using imputed high-density genotypes for 5 breeds of dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic evaluations with many more genotypes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Strategies and utility of imputed SNP genotypes for genomic analysis in dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Reliability of genomic evaluations in Holstein-Friesians using haplotypes based on the BovineHD BeadChip.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic inbreeding coefficients using imputation genotypes: Assessing the effect of ancestral genotyping in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of genomic predictions using medium-density (∼54,000) and high-density (∼777,000) single nucleotide polymorphism marker panels in Nordic Holstein and Red Dairy Cattle populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparing strategies for selection of low-density SNPs for imputation-mediated genomic prediction in U. S. Holsteins.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Short communication: genomic evaluations of final score for US Holsteins benefit from the inclusion of genotypes on cows.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Imputation accuracy from low- to medium-density SNP chips for US crossbred dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Effect of imputing markers from a low-density chip on the reliability of genomic breeding values in Holstein populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.