Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparing strategies for selection of low-density SNPs for imputation-mediated genomic prediction in U. S. Holsteins.

Genetica - 1 Apr 2018

He Jun, Xu Jiaqi, Wu Xiao-Lin, Bauck Stewart, Lee Jungjae, Morota Gota, Kachman Stephen D, Spangler Matthew L

Abstract excerpt

SNP chips are commonly used for genotyping animals in genomic selection but strategies for selecting low-density (LD) SNPs for imputation-mediated genomic selection have not been addressed adequately. The main purpose of the present study was to compare the performance of eight LD (6K) SNP panels, each selected by a different strategy exploiting a combination of three major factors: evenly-spaced SNPs, increased...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Cattle
Share to MAF gene
Share to Genomics

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genotype

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Share to United States

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 29243001
DOI: 10.1007/s10709-017-0004-9

Genes

MAF

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparing strategies for selection of low-density SNPs for imputation-mediated genomic prediction in U. S. Holsteins.PMID 29243001Read ↗

Strategies and utility of imputed SNP genotypes for genomic analysis in dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Imputation of genotypes with low-density chips and its effect on reliability of direct genomic values in Dutch Holstein cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Marker selection and genomic prediction of economically important traits using imputed high-density genotypes for 5 breeds of dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of developed low-density genotype panels for imputation to higher density in independent dairy and beef cattle populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Design of a low-density SNP chip for the main Australian sheep breeds and its effect on imputation and genomic prediction accuracy.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of genomic predictions using medium-density (∼54,000) and high-density (∼777,000) single nucleotide polymorphism marker panels in Nordic Holstein and Red Dairy Cattle populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Accuracy of genomic prediction using low-density marker panels.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assets of imputation to ultra-high density for productive and functional traits.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Short communication: Imputation performances of 3 low-density marker panels in beef and dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Design of a bovine low-density SNP array optimized for imputation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Reliability of genomic prediction for German Holsteins using imputed genotypes from low-density chips.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Error rate for imputation from the Illumina BovineSNP50 chip to the Illumina BovineHD chip.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.