Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Technical note: adjustment of traditional cow evaluations to improve accuracy of genomic predictions.

Journal of dairy science - 1 Dec 2011

Wiggans G R, Cooper T A, Vanraden P M, Cole J B

Abstract excerpt

Genomic evaluations are calculated using deregressed predicted transmitting abilities (PTA) from traditional evaluations to estimate effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms. The direct genomic value (sum of an animal's marker effects) should be consistent with traditional PTA, which is the case for bulls. However, traditional PTA of yield traits (milk, fat, and protein) for genotyped cows are higher than their...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Cattle
Share to Chromosome Mapping
Share to Dairying

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genome

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Share to Quantitative Trait, Heritable

Share to Reproducibility of Results

Share to Species Specificity

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 22118107
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4481

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Technical note: adjustment of traditional cow evaluations to improve accuracy of genomic predictions.PMID 22118107Read ↗

Technical note: adjustment of all cow evaluations for yield traits to be comparable with bull evaluations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Short communication: genomic evaluations of final score for US Holsteins benefit from the inclusion of genotypes on cows.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Association of genomically enhanced and parent average breeding values with cow performance in Nordic dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Multiple-trait genomic evaluation of linear type traits using genomic and phenotypic data in US Holsteins.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Technical note: Rapid calculation of genomic evaluations for new animals.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Accuracy and bias of genomic prediction with different de-regression methods.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The effect of using cow genomic information on accuracy and bias of genomic breeding values in a simulated Holstein dairy cattle population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Using genomics to enhance selection of novel traits in North American dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The genomic evaluation system in the United States: past, present, future.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.