Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

The genomic evaluation system in the United States: past, present, future.

Journal of dairy science - 1 Jun 2011

Wiggans G R, Vanraden P M, Cooper T A

Abstract excerpt

Implementation of genomic evaluation has caused profound changes in dairy cattle breeding. All young bulls bought by major artificial insemination organizations now are selected based on such evaluation. Evaluation reliability can reach approximately 75% for yield traits, which is adequate for marketing semen of 2-yr-old bulls. Shortened generation interval from using genomic evaluations is the most important...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Cattle
Share to Dairying
Share to Genome

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genotype

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Share to Reproducibility of Results

Share to United States

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 21605789
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3866

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

The genomic evaluation system in the United States: past, present, future.PMID 21605789Read ↗

Genomic Selection in Dairy Cattle: The USDA Experience.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Current status of genomic evaluation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Changes in genetic trends in US dairy cattle since the implementation of genomic selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Short communication: genomic evaluations of final score for US Holsteins benefit from the inclusion of genotypes on cows.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Selection and management of DNA markers for use in genomic evaluation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Technical note: adjustment of all cow evaluations for yield traits to be comparable with bull evaluations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Increasing the number of single nucleotide polymorphisms used in genomic evaluation of dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Short communication: Analysis of genomic predictor population for Holstein dairy cattle in the United States--Effects of sex and age.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Technical note: Characteristics and use of the Illumina BovineLD and GeneSeek Genomic Profiler low-density bead chips for genomic evaluation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic evaluation, breed identification, and population structure of Guernsey cattle in North America, Great Britain, and the Isle of Guernsey.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.