Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

The standardization-generalization dilemma: a way out.

Genes, brain, and behavior - 1 Nov 2010

van der Staay F Josef, Arndt S S, Nordquist R E

Abstract excerpt

Recently, a debate has emerged on the use and necessity of standardization in experimental testing using animal subjects. The difficulties encountered when trying to reconcile standardization and generalization largely underlie this debate. The more specific the testing procedures are, the less o...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Epigenomics
Share to Genetics, Behavioral
Share to Models, Animal

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Phenotype

Share to Reproducibility of Results

Share to Research Design

Share to Validation Studies as Topic

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 20662940
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2010.00628.x

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-20662940-2026-09-02.2. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-02.2.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

The standardization-generalization dilemma: a way out.PMID 20662940Read ↗

Refinement and reduction through the control of variation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Reproducibility and replicability of rodent phenotyping in preclinical studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Warning: the use of heterogeneous mice may seriously damage your research.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Of Mice and Men: The Inter-individual Variability of the Brain's Response to DrugsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Animal Models in Neuroscience: What “Culture of Care”?Semantic proximity Read ↗

How to address human interindividual variation in the process of animal extrapolation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Use of a standard strain for external calibration in behavioral phenotyping.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Meta-analysis of variation suggests that embracing variability improves both replicability and generalizability in preclinical research.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetically Defined Strains in Drug Development and Toxicity Testing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Embrace heterogeneity to improve reproducibility: A perspective from meta-analysis of variation in preclinical researchSemantic proximity Read ↗

Clarifying the reliability paradox: poor test-retest reliability attenuates group differencesSemantic proximity Read ↗

A Systematic Assessment of Robustness in CNS Safety PharmacologySemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.