Back to search

Article

Clarifying the reliability paradox: poor test-retest reliability attenuates group differences

2025-02-08

Abstract excerpt

<p>Cognitive sciences are grappling with the reliability paradox: measures that robustly produce within-group effects tend to have low test-retest reliability, rendering them unsuitable for studying individual differences. Despite the growing awareness of this paradox, its full extent remains underappreciated. Specifically, most research focuses exclusively on how reliability affects correlational analyses of indi...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
724a6feb-9e07-53da-9ea6-4974f0f35ca6
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/z4yqe_v2
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Clarifying the reliability paradox: poor test-retest reliability attenuates group differencesDOI 10.31234/osf.io/z4yqe_v2
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.