Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Dealing with sparse data in predicting outcomes of HIV combination therapies.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) - 1 Sept 2010

Bogojeska Jasmina, Bickel Steffen, Altmann André, Lengauer Thomas

Abstract excerpt

MOTIVATION: As there exists no cure or vaccine for the infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the standard approach to treating HIV patients is to repeatedly administer different combinations of several antiretroviral drugs. Because of the large number of possible drug combinations, m...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Anti-HIV Agents
Share to Artificial Intelligence
Share to Drug Therapy, Combination

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genotype

Share to HIV Infections

Share to Logistic Models

Share to Treatment Outcome

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 20624779
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq361

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-20624779-2026-09-02.2. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-02.2.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Dealing with sparse data in predicting outcomes of HIV combination therapies.PMID 20624779Read ↗

Comparison of classifier fusion methods for predicting response to anti HIV-1 therapy.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Selecting anti-HIV therapies based on a variety of genomic and clinical factors.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Learning from past treatments and their outcome improves prediction of in vivo response to anti-HIV therapy.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Unraveling HIV protease drug resistance and genetic diversity with kernel methodsSemantic proximity Read ↗

HIV drug resistance prediction with weighted categorical kernel functionsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Computational models for prediction of response to antiretroviral therapies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Predicting the response to combination antiretroviral therapy: retrospective validation of geno2pheno-THEO on a large clinical database.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Improved prediction of response to antiretroviral combination therapy using the genetic barrier to drug resistance.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Prediction of HIV-1 drug susceptibility phenotype from the viral genotype using linear regression modeling.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Predicting response to antiretroviral treatment by machine learning: the EuResist project.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Characterizing classes of antiretroviral drugs by genotype.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Methods for optimizing antiviral combination therapies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.