Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Oral sensory phenotype identifies level of sugar and fat required for maximal liking.

Physiology & behavior - 3 Sept 2008

Hayes John E, Duffy Valerie B

Abstract excerpt

A half-century ago, Fischer and colleagues found correlations between food preference and genetic markers of taste [6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP), quinine]. Recently, a number of studies report differences in sweet liking/disliking with taste phenotype or genotype. Here we modeled optimal liking for milk/sugar mixtures using the response surface method among 79 mostly normal weight adults (36 women) who reported...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Analysis of Variance
Share to Carbohydrates
Share to Fats

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Feeding Behavior

Share to Food Preferences

Share to Propylthiouracil

Share to Quinine

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 18538361
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.04.023
PMCID: PMC2564984

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-06.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Oral sensory phenotype identifies level of sugar and fat required for maximal liking.PMID 18538361Read ↗

Revisiting sugar-fat mixtures: sweetness and creaminess vary with phenotypic markers of oral sensation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Food acceptance and genetic variation in taste.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The proof is in the pudding: children prefer lower fat but higher sugar than do mothers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparing sensory experiences across individuals: recent psychophysical advances illuminate genetic variation in taste perception.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Associations between taste genetics, oral sensation and alcohol intake.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Factors Influencing the Phenotypic Characterization of the Oral Marker, PROP.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Reconsidering the classification of sweet taste liker phenotypes: A methodological reviewSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic Variants Influencing Taste Perception and Food Preferences: Current Evidence.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Taste phenotype associates with cardiovascular disease risk factors via diet quality in multivariate modeling.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Associations between Sweet Taste Sensitivity and Polymorphisms (SNPs) in the TAS1R2 and TAS1R3 Genes, Gender, PROP Taster Status, and Density of Fungiform Papillae in a Genetically Homogeneous Sardinian Cohort.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Allelic variation in TAS2R bitter receptor genes associates with variation in sensations from and ingestive behaviors toward common bitter beverages in adults.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Explaining variability in sodium intake through oral sensory phenotype, salt sensation and liking.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.