Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Theories of carcinogenesis: an emerging perspective.

Seminars in cancer biology - 1 Oct 2008

Sonnenschein Carlos, Soto Ana M

Abstract excerpt

Four decades ago Leslie Foulds remarked that "Experimental analysis has produced an alarming mass of empirical facts without providing an adequate language for their communication or effective concepts for their synthesis". Examining the relevance of the data avalanche we all generate and are sub...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Models, Biological
Share to Mutation
Share to Neoplasms

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 18472276
DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2008.03.012
PMCID: PMC2730644

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-18472276-2026-09-02.2. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-02.2.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Theories of carcinogenesis: an emerging perspective.PMID 18472276Read ↗

Somatic mutation theory of carcinogenesis: why it should be dropped and replaced.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The somatic mutation theory of cancer: growing problems with the paradigm?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Over a century of cancer research: Inconvenient truths and promising leads.Semantic proximity Read ↗

SMT and TOFT: Why and How They are Opposite and Incompatible Paradigms.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The tissue organization field theory of cancer: a testable replacement for the somatic mutation theory.Semantic proximity Read ↗

SMT or TOFT? How the two main theories of carcinogenesis are made (artificially) incompatible.Semantic proximity Read ↗

New hypotheses for cancer generation and progression.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Models of carcinogenesis: an overview.Semantic proximity Read ↗

An Integrative Approach Toward Biology, Organisms, and Cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Paradoxical Behavior of Oncogenes Undermines the Somatic Mutation Theory.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Competing views on cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Cancer as a global health crisis with deep evolutionary rootsSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.