Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Bias-reduced estimators and confidence intervals for odds ratios in genome-wide association studies.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England) - 1 Oct 2008

Zhong Hua, Prentice Ross L

Abstract excerpt

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) provide an important approach to identifying common genetic variants that predispose to human disease. A typical GWAS may genotype hundreds of thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located throughout the human genome in a set of cases and contr...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Algorithms
Share to Computer Simulation
Share to Confidence Intervals

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Likelihood Functions

Share to Logistic Models

Share to Models, Statistical

Share to Odds Ratio

Share to Selection Bias

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 18310059
DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxn001
PMCID: PMC2536726

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-18310059-2026-09-02.1. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-02.1.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Bias-reduced estimators and confidence intervals for odds ratios in genome-wide association studies.PMID 18310059Read ↗

Correcting "winner's curse" in odds ratios from genomewide association findings for major complex human diseases.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Quantifying and correcting for the winner's curse in genetic association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Review and further developments in statistical corrections for Winner's Curse in genetic association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Improving power of genome-wide association studies with weighted false discovery rate control and prioritized subset analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Empirical Bayes correction for the Winner's Curse in genetic association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Upward bias in odds ratio estimates from genome-wide association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Bias correction for inverse variance weighting Mendelian randomization.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Statistical power of model selection strategies for genome-wide association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Weighted multiple testing procedures in genome-wide association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Bayesian multiple logistic regression for case-control GWASSemantic proximity Read ↗

Recommended joint and meta-analysis strategies for case-control association testing of single low-count variants.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic effect estimates in case-control studies when a continuous variable is omitted from the modelSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.