Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

UK gamete donors' reflections on the removal of anonymity: implications for recruitment

20 Apr 2007

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: In 2005, UK legislation was changed requiring any donor of gametes or embryos used in the treatment of others to agree to the disclosure of their identity to any offspring reaching the age of 18. METHODS AND RESULTS: This paper analyses responses of a survey of existing donors' views on the removal of donor anonymity that was undertaken by the Department of Health (UK) as part of its review that...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Share to Organ Donation and Transplantation
Share to Reproductive Health and Technologies

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 17449513
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem061

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

UK gamete donors' reflections on the removal of anonymity: implications for recruitmentPMID 17449513Read ↗

Potential sperm donors’, recipients’ and their partners’ opinions towards the release of identifying information in Western AustraliaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Thinking ethically about genetic inheritance: liberal rights, communitarianism and the right to privacy for parents of donor insemination childrenSemantic proximity Read ↗

Sperm donor recruitment in the UKSemantic proximity Read ↗

The right to know one’s genetic origins and cross-border medically assisted reproductionSemantic proximity Read ↗

The impact of disclosure on donor gamete participants: donors, intended parents and offspringSemantic proximity Read ↗

Consent agreements for cryopreserved embryos: the case for choiceSemantic proximity Read ↗

Parent identity and ‘virtual’ children: why patients discard rather than donate unused embryosSemantic proximity Read ↗

Short- and long-term health consequences and current satisfaction levels for altruistic anonymous, identity-release and known oocyte donorsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Donor conception, direct-to-consumer genetic testing, choices, and procedural justice: an argument for reform of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990Semantic proximity Read ↗

DONATION OF 'SPARE' FRESH OR FROZEN EMBRYOS TO RESEARCH: WHO DECIDES THAT AN EMBRYO IS 'SPARE' AND HOW CAN WE ENHANCE THE QUALITY AND PROTECT THE VALIDITY OF CONSENT?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Disclosure and donor-conceived childrenSemantic proximity Read ↗

Beneath the Rhetoric: The Role of Rights in the Practice of Non‐Anonymous Gamete DonationSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.