Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Beneath the Rhetoric: The Role of Rights in the Practice of Non‐Anonymous Gamete Donation

1 Oct 2001

Abstract excerpt

The use of rights based arguments to justify claims that donor offspring should have access to information identifying their gamete donor has become increasingly widespread. In this paper, I do not intend to revisit the debate about the validity of such rights. Rather, the purpose is to examine the way such alleged rights have been implemented by those legislatures that have allowed access to identifying...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Share to Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
Share to Reproductive Health and Technologies

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 12058771
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8519.00255

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Beneath the Rhetoric: The Role of Rights in the Practice of Non‐Anonymous Gamete DonationPMID 12058771Read ↗

The right of the donor to information about children conceived from his or her gametesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Thinking ethically about genetic inheritance: liberal rights, communitarianism and the right to privacy for parents of donor insemination childrenSemantic proximity Read ↗

Donor conception, direct-to-consumer genetic testing, choices, and procedural justice: an argument for reform of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990Semantic proximity Read ↗

The right to know one’s genetic origins and cross-border medically assisted reproductionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Potential sperm donors’, recipients’ and their partners’ opinions towards the release of identifying information in Western AustraliaSemantic proximity Read ↗

The impact of disclosure on donor gamete participants: donors, intended parents and offspringSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic identity concerns in the regulation of novel reproductive technologiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

UK gamete donors' reflections on the removal of anonymity: implications for recruitmentSemantic proximity Read ↗

Rethinking the 'right not to know'.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Gamete Donation and Parental ResponsibilitySemantic proximity Read ↗

"Obligated aliens": recognizing sperm donors' ethical obligation to disclose genetic information.Semantic proximity Read ↗

WHAT ROLE SHOULD PUBLIC OPINION PLAY IN ETHICO-LEGAL DECISION MAKING? THE EXAMPLE OF SELECTING SEX FOR NON-MEDICAL REASONS USING PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.