Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Thinking ethically about genetic inheritance: liberal rights, communitarianism and the right to privacy for parents of donor insemination children

28 Mar 2008

Abstract excerpt

The issue of genetic inheritance, and particularly the contradictory rights of donors, recipients and donor offspring as to the disclosure of donor identities, is ethically complicated. Donors, donor offspring and parents of donor offspring may appeal to individual rights for confidentiality or disclosure within legal systems based on liberal rights discourse. This paper explores the ethical issues of...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Share to Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Share to Reproductive Health and Technologies

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 18375682
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2007.020412

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Thinking ethically about genetic inheritance: liberal rights, communitarianism and the right to privacy for parents of donor insemination childrenPMID 18375682Read ↗

The right to know one’s genetic origins and cross-border medically assisted reproductionSemantic proximity Read ↗

"Obligated aliens": recognizing sperm donors' ethical obligation to disclose genetic information.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Beneath the Rhetoric: The Role of Rights in the Practice of Non‐Anonymous Gamete DonationSemantic proximity Read ↗

The right of the donor to information about children conceived from his or her gametesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Potential sperm donors’, recipients’ and their partners’ opinions towards the release of identifying information in Western AustraliaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Legislated right for donor-insemination children to know their genetic origin: a study of parental thinkingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Disclosure and donor-conceived childrenSemantic proximity Read ↗

Donor conception, direct-to-consumer genetic testing, choices, and procedural justice: an argument for reform of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990Semantic proximity Read ↗

The right not to know: an autonomy based approach.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The impact of disclosure on donor gamete participants: donors, intended parents and offspringSemantic proximity Read ↗

UK gamete donors' reflections on the removal of anonymity: implications for recruitmentSemantic proximity Read ↗

Choosing embryos: ethical complexity and relational autonomy in staff accounts of PGDSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.