Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Donor conception, direct-to-consumer genetic testing, choices, and procedural justice: an argument for reform of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990

1 Jan 2024

Abstract excerpt

In this article, using theories of procedural justice and 'slow violence', we consider potential reform of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. Our theoretical discussion is underpinned by findings from the ConnecteDNA project, exploring how people affected by donor conception experience direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTCGT). The negative impacts of DTCGT, especially shock discoveries about the...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Reproductive Health and Technologies

Source

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Identifiers

PMID: 39067441
DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwae028

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Donor conception, direct-to-consumer genetic testing, choices, and procedural justice: an argument for reform of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990PMID 39067441Read ↗

The right to know one’s genetic origins and cross-border medically assisted reproductionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing and the changing landscape of gamete donor conception: key issues for practitioners and stakeholdersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Beneath the Rhetoric: The Role of Rights in the Practice of Non‐Anonymous Gamete DonationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Thinking ethically about genetic inheritance: liberal rights, communitarianism and the right to privacy for parents of donor insemination childrenSemantic proximity Read ↗

The Right to Know and the Right Not to Know Revisited: Part OneSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic Counseling and the Ethical Issues Around Direct to Consumer Genetic TestingSemantic proximity Read ↗

The right of the donor to information about children conceived from his or her gametesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Qualifying choice: ethical reflection on the scope of prenatal screeningSemantic proximity Read ↗

The right not to know: an autonomy based approach.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparing Germany and Israel regarding debates on policy-making at the beginning of life: PGD, NIPT and their paths of routinizationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Choices and Rights: Eugenics, genetics and disability equalitySemantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic identity concerns in the regulation of novel reproductive technologiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.