Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

The impact of disclosure on donor gamete participants: donors, intended parents and offspring

6 May 2008

Abstract excerpt

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The present review examines recent publications that provide insight into how the trend toward nonanonymity and disclosure in gamete donation impacts donors, intended parents, and their donor-conceived children. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent findings show an increase in donor programs that offer open-identity between donors and offspring. The psychological needs of gamete donors and their attitudes...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Ovarian function and disorders
Share to Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Share to Reproductive Health and Technologies

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 18460941
DOI: 10.1097/gco.0b013e32830136ca

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

The impact of disclosure on donor gamete participants: donors, intended parents and offspringPMID 18460941Read ↗

Disclosure and donor-conceived childrenSemantic proximity Read ↗

Potential sperm donors’, recipients’ and their partners’ opinions towards the release of identifying information in Western AustraliaSemantic proximity Read ↗

The right of the donor to information about children conceived from his or her gametesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Disclosure behaviour and intentions among 111 couples following treatment with oocytes or sperm from identity-release donors: follow-up at offspring age 1-4 yearsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Psychological adjustment in disclosing and non-disclosing heterosexual-couple families following conception with oocytes or spermatozoa from identity-release donorsSemantic proximity Read ↗

A survey of 1700 women who formed their families using donor spermatozoaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Thinking ethically about genetic inheritance: liberal rights, communitarianism and the right to privacy for parents of donor insemination childrenSemantic proximity Read ↗

Short- and long-term health consequences and current satisfaction levels for altruistic anonymous, identity-release and known oocyte donorsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Gamete Donation and Parental ResponsibilitySemantic proximity Read ↗

Parents’ experiences telling children conceived by gamete and embryo donation about their genetic originsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Parent psychological adjustment, donor conception and disclosure: a follow-up over 10 yearsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Parent identity and ‘virtual’ children: why patients discard rather than donate unused embryosSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.