Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Salvage Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction After Failed Conventional Testicular Sperm Extraction in Patients With Nonobstructive Azoospermia

3 Mar 2006

Abstract excerpt

PURPOSE: TESE is considered the best procedure for identifying a tubule for spermatozoa retrieval. This technique improves the SRR to around 50%. However, it has been unclear whether it is useful in patients in whom conventional TESE has failed. We compared the outcome of microdissection TESE in patients in whom conventional TESE failed to that in patients who did not undergo conventional TESE. We also evaluated...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Share to Sperm and Testicular Function

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Testicular diseases and treatments

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 16516017
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)00678-6

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 8 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Salvage Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction After Failed Conventional Testicular Sperm Extraction in Patients With Nonobstructive AzoospermiaPMID 16516017Read ↗

Feasibility of repeat microdissection testicular sperm extraction within 6 months for nonobstructive azoospermiaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Predictors of sperm retrieval success in first-time and repeated Micro-TESE for nonobstructive azoospermiaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Microdissection Testicular Sperm ExtractionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Factors influencing sperm retrieval following testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia patientsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Ultrasonographically determined size of seminiferous tubules predicts sperm retrieval by microdissection testicular sperm extraction in men with nonobstructive azoospermiaSemantic proximity Read ↗

MicroRNA profile comparison of testicular tissues derived from successful and unsuccessful microdissection testicular sperm extraction retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia patientsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical factors impacting microdissection testicular sperm extraction success in hypogonadal men with nonobstructive azoospermiaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Role of Optimizing Testosterone Before Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction in Men with Nonobstructive AzoospermiaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Prediction Models for Successful Sperm Retrieval in Patients with Non-Obstructive Azoospermia Undergoing Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction: Is There Any Room for Further Studies?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Factors predicting successful sperm retrieval in men with nonobstructive Azoospermia: A single center perspectiveSemantic proximity Read ↗

Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction: Effect of Prior Biopsy on Success of Sperm RetrievalSemantic proximity Read ↗

Surgical recovery of sperm in non-obstructive azoospermia.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.