Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Feasibility of repeat microdissection testicular sperm extraction within 6 months for nonobstructive azoospermia

8 Nov 2022

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) is the mainstay of sperm retrieval in men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). Some experts believe that a resting period of ≥6 months is required between procedures to ensure better sperm retrieval rates and fewer complications. However, no scientific studies have investigated how long patients should wait before arranging a second mTESE...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
Share to Sperm and Testicular Function
Share to Testicular diseases and treatments

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 36346204
DOI: 10.1097/jcma.0000000000000842

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Feasibility of repeat microdissection testicular sperm extraction within 6 months for nonobstructive azoospermiaPMID 36346204Read ↗

Predictors of sperm retrieval success in first-time and repeated Micro-TESE for nonobstructive azoospermiaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Salvage Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction After Failed Conventional Testicular Sperm Extraction in Patients With Nonobstructive AzoospermiaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Microdissection Testicular Sperm ExtractionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical management of nonobstructive azoospermia: An updateSemantic proximity Read ↗

Role of Optimizing Testosterone Before Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction in Men with Nonobstructive AzoospermiaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Factors predicting successful sperm retrieval in men with nonobstructive Azoospermia: A single center perspectiveSemantic proximity Read ↗

Identifying Pre-operative Factors for Successful Micro-dissection Testicular Sperm Extraction in Non-Obstructive AzoospermiaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Sperm retrieval techniques for assisted reproductionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Anti-Müllerian hormone predicts positive sperm retrieval in men with idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermia—findings from a multi-centric cross-sectional studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Future prospects for the advancement of treatment of men with NOA: focus on gene editing, artificial sperm, stem cells, and use of imagingSemantic proximity Read ↗

MicroRNA profile comparison of testicular tissues derived from successful and unsuccessful microdissection testicular sperm extraction retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia patientsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical factors impacting microdissection testicular sperm extraction success in hypogonadal men with nonobstructive azoospermiaSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.