Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Predictors of sperm retrieval success in first-time and repeated Micro-TESE for nonobstructive azoospermia

30 May 2025

Abstract excerpt

Introduction Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) is the preferred sperm retrieval method, although success rates vary based on factors such as age and hormone levels. We evaluate sperm retrieval outcomes in first-time and repeated micro-TESE, identifying predictors of success to guide clinical management.Material and methods Retrospective study analyzed 152 men with nonobstructive azoospermia...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Ovarian function and disorders
Share to Reproductive Health and Technologies
Share to Sperm and Testicular Function

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 40446124
DOI: 10.1080/20565623.2025.2511449

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Predictors of sperm retrieval success in first-time and repeated Micro-TESE for nonobstructive azoospermiaPMID 40446124Read ↗

Clinical factors impacting microdissection testicular sperm extraction success in hypogonadal men with nonobstructive azoospermiaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Identifying Pre-operative Factors for Successful Micro-dissection Testicular Sperm Extraction in Non-Obstructive AzoospermiaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Factors predicting successful sperm retrieval in men with nonobstructive Azoospermia: A single center perspectiveSemantic proximity Read ↗

Impact of AZFc deletion subtypes on sperm retrieval rates via micro-TESE and ICSI outcomes in non-obstructive azoospermia patientsSemantic proximity Read ↗

AI predictive models and advancements in microdissection testicular sperm extraction for non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic scoping reviewSemantic proximity Read ↗

Feasibility of repeat microdissection testicular sperm extraction within 6 months for nonobstructive azoospermiaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Predictors of Successful Testicular Sperm Extraction: A New Era for Men with Non-Obstructive AzoospermiaSemantic proximity Read ↗

The effect of discordance between embryologist and pathologist on sperm retrieval rates in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia undergoing mTESESemantic proximity Read ↗

Prediction Models for Successful Sperm Retrieval in Patients with Non-Obstructive Azoospermia Undergoing Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction: Is There Any Room for Further Studies?Semantic proximity Read ↗

A systemic review and meta‐analysis exploring the predictors of sperm retrieval in patients with non‐obstructive azoospermia and chromosomal abnormalitiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Future prospects for the advancement of treatment of men with NOA: focus on gene editing, artificial sperm, stem cells, and use of imagingSemantic proximity Read ↗

MicroRNA profile comparison of testicular tissues derived from successful and unsuccessful microdissection testicular sperm extraction retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia patientsSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.