Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Feasibility of identifying families for genetic studies of birth defects using the National Health Interview Survey.

BMC public health - 12 May 2004

Wyszynski Diego F, Nolan Vikki G

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the National Health Interview Survey is a useful source to identify informative families for genetic studies of birth defects. METHODS: The 1994/1995 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) was used to identify households where individuals with two or more birth defects reside. Four groups of households were identified: 1) single non-familial (one...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Age Distribution
Share to Congenital Abnormalities
Share to Educational Status

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Family Characteristics

Share to Family Health

Share to Geography

Share to Health Surveys

Share to Population Surveillance

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 15140264
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-4-16
PMCID: PMC420469

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Feasibility of identifying families for genetic studies of birth defects using the National Health Interview Survey.PMID 15140264Read ↗

The National Birth Defects Prevention Study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Public Health Practice of Population-Based Birth Defects Surveillance Programs in the United States.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The National Birth Defects Prevention Study: A review of the methods.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic epidemiology and nonsyndromic structural birth defects: from candidate genes to epigenetics.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Selected birth defects data from population‐based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States, 2006 to 2010: Featuring trisomy conditionsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Guidelines for case classification for the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Patterns of multiple congenital anomalies in the National Birth Defect Prevention Study: Challenges and insightsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Detecting gene-environment interactions in human birth defects: Study designs and statistical methods.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Findings from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study: Interpretation and translation for the clinician.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Exploring the potential to use data linkage for investigating the relationship between birth defects and prenatal alcohol exposureSemantic proximity Read ↗

A modified panel of sentinel congenital anomalies for potential use in mutation epidemiology based on birth defects registry data.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Birth defects data from population‐based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States, 2007 to 2011: Highlighting orofacial cleftsSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.