Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Guidelines for case classification for the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.

Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology - 1 Mar 2003

Rasmussen Sonja A, Olney Richard S, Holmes Lewis B, Lin Angela E, Keppler-Noreuil Kim M, Moore Cynthia A

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that etiologic heterogeneity may complicate epidemiologic analyses designed to identify risk factors for birth defects. Case classification uses knowledge of embryologic and pathogenetic mechanisms to make case groups more homogeneous and is important t...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Algorithms
Share to Congenital Abnormalities
Share to Infant, Newborn

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Maternal Exposure

Share to Population Surveillance

Share to Pregnancy

Share to Registries

Share to United States

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 12797461
DOI: 10.1002/bdra.10012

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 1 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-12797461-2026-09-01.1. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-01.1.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 1 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Guidelines for case classification for the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.PMID 12797461Read ↗

The National Birth Defects Prevention Study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The National Birth Defects Prevention Study: A review of the methods.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Findings from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study: Interpretation and translation for the clinician.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Birth defects data from population‐based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States, 2007 to 2011: Highlighting orofacial cleftsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Next steps for birth defects research and prevention: The birth defects study to evaluate pregnancy exposures (BD-STEPS).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Orofacial clefts in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2004Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic susceptibility to birth defects in humans: from gene discovery to public health action.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Patterns of multiple congenital anomalies in the National Birth Defect Prevention Study: Challenges and insightsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic epidemiology and nonsyndromic structural birth defects: from candidate genes to epigenetics.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Etiology and clinical presentation of birth defects: population based studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Developments in our understanding of the genetic basis of birth defects.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Integration of DNA sample collection into a multi-site birth defects case-control study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.