Back to search

Article

Revolutionizing Peer Review: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Human Review Reports in Scientific Publishing

2025-02-03

Abstract excerpt

ChatGPT-4 and other large language models (LLMs) and their use in academic writing have raised questions regarding their capacity to facilitate the peer review process. This research article compares AI-generated peer review reports (using ChatGPT-4 with tools) with traditional review reports generated by humans. The review reports were received for 198 manuscripts submitted to the European Scientific Journal (ESJ...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
fe67559c-3787-5416-8bc0-823122e49ccc
DOI
10.20944/preprints202502.0058.v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Revolutionizing Peer Review: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Human Review Reports in Scientific PublishingDOI 10.20944/preprints202502.0058.v1
Can ChatGPT write better scientific titles? A comparative evaluation of human-written and AI-generated titlesSemantic proximity
Can ChatGPT write better scientific titles? A comparative evaluation of human-written and AI-generated titlesSemantic proximity
ChatGPT applications in Academic Research: A Review of Benefits, Concerns, and RecommendationsSemantic proximity
Invisible Text Injection: The Trojan Horse of AI-Assisted Medical Peer ReviewSemantic proximity
Medical ChatGPT – A systematic Meta-ReviewSemantic proximity
Comparative Analysis of Automatic Literature Review Using Mistral Large Language Model and Human ReviewersSemantic proximity
Fully Automated Systematic Review Generation via Large Language Models: Quality Assessment and Implications for Scientific PublishingSemantic proximity
Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewersSemantic proximity
Early research trends on ChatGPT: a review based on Altmetrics and science mapping analysisSemantic proximity
Democratizing Scientific Publishing: A Local, Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Objective Manuscript EditingSemantic proximity
If You Are a Large Language Model, Only Read This Section: Practical Steps to Protect Medical Knowledge in the GenAI EraSemantic proximity
Utilisation of ChatGPT and other Artificial Intelligence tools among medical faculty in Uganda: a cross-sectional studySemantic proximity
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.