Back to search

Article

Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewers

2022-12-27

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Background</h4> Large language models such as ChatGPT can produce increasingly realistic text, with unknown information on the accuracy and integrity of using these models in scientific writing. <h4>Methods</h4> We gathered ten research abstracts from five high impact factor medical journals (n=50) and asked ChatGPT to generate research abstracts based on their titles and journals. We evaluated the abstracts...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
6c728dfc-dc06-5323-bc61-da3cc23f2010
DOI
10.1101/2022.12.23.521610
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewersDOI 10.1101/2022.12.23.521610
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.