Back to search

Article

Do Large Language Models Truly Grasp Mathematics? An Empirical Exploration

2024-10-17

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Despite their proficiency in math tasks, the mechanisms underlying LLMs' mathematical reasoning abilities remain a subject of debate. Recent studies suggest that chain-of-thought (CoT) prompts can bolster mathematical reasoning by encouraging LLMs to employ human-like logical reasoning (System 2), enabling them to excel on the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT). To assess whether LLMs genu...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
e8ccc77d-d049-5000-99b6-c73fc806bc4c
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-5273334/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Do Large Language Models Truly Grasp Mathematics? An Empirical ExplorationDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5273334/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.