Back to search

Article

The cost of thinking is similar between large reasoning models and humans

2025-07-24

Abstract excerpt

<p>Do neural network models capture the cognitive demands of human reasoning? Across four reasoning domains, we show that the length of the chain-of-thought generated by a large reasoning model predicts human reaction times both within tasks—tracking item-level difficulty—and across tasks—capturing broader differences in cognitive demands. This model-to-human alignment shows that reasoning models mirror core featu...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
f2e7ccfe-2444-5eea-a6b9-0ab9804b975a
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/m2cu5_v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
The cost of thinking is similar between large reasoning models and humansDOI 10.31234/osf.io/m2cu5_v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.