Article

Graphical Item Maps: providing clearer feedback on professional exam performance

2018-06-01

Abstract excerpt

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. B ackground: Structured feedback is an important component of learning and assessment and is highly valued by candidates. Unfortunately, item specific feedback is generally not feasible for high stakes professional assessments due to the high cost of item development and the need to maintain stable assessment performance characteristics. In a high s...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: e8137c6b-d8dc-52c5-801a-9f31d849de5b
DOI: 10.15694/mep.2018.0000116.1

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Graphical Item Maps: providing clearer feedback on professional exam performanceDOI 10.15694/mep.2018.0000116.1Read

Automated Item Generation: – Impact of item variants on performance and standard settingSemantic proximity Read

Looks good on paper: LLM-generated exams are face-valid but psychometrically weaker than human assessmentsSemantic proximity Read

Using a hybrid of artificial intelligence and template-based method in automatic item generation to create multiple-choice questions in medical education: Hybrid AIGSemantic proximity Read

Psychometric Performance and Student Perceptions of AI- versus Human-Generated Multiple-Choice Questions: The AHEAD Randomized Controlled TrialSemantic proximity Read

Expert validation of AI-generated clinical assessment items for physician assistant certification: a multi-dimensional rubric and dual- reliability methodSemantic proximity Read

GPT-4 versus human authors in clinically complex MCQ creation: a blinded analysis of item qualitySemantic proximity Read

Immediate and longer-term impacts of fetal surveillance education on workforce knowledge and cognitive skillsSemantic proximity Read

Ten Tips for AI‑Assisted Key Feature Problems: A Validity‑Informed Guide for Medical EducationSemantic proximity Read

Field-testing multiple-choice questions with AI examinees: English grammar itemsSemantic proximity Read

Can AI Match Human Experts? Evaluating LLM-Generated Feedback on Resident Scholarly ProjectsSemantic proximity Read

Evaluating Generative AI as an Educational Tool for Radiology Resident Report DraftingSemantic proximity Read

Can Large Language Models Emulate Human Performance on Educational Assessments?Semantic proximity Read