Back to search

Article

Whole-genome sequencing is more powerful than whole-exome sequencing for detecting exome variants

2014-10-14

Abstract excerpt

We compared whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) in six unrelated individuals. In the regions targeted by WES capture (81.5% of the consensus coding genome), the mean numbers of single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small insertions/deletions (indels) detected per sample were 84,192 and 13,325, respectively, for WES, and 84,968 and 12,702, respectively, for WGS. For both SNVs and indels,...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
dacb4a6e-79ae-556b-85e8-9b261ec545c0
DOI
10.1101/010363
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Whole-genome sequencing is more powerful than whole-exome sequencing for detecting exome variantsDOI 10.1101/010363
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.