Back to search

Article

Mapping Methodology to Identify Research Gaps and Priorities in Existing Scoping Reviews - A Scoping Review

2026-01-06

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Background: </h4> Identifying research gaps and priorities guides evidence-informed decision-making in health and social sciences. Although scoping reviews are widely used to map evidence and highlight gaps, but definitions, conceptualizations, and methods for identifying gaps and priorities vary considerably, resulting in inconsistent methodological approaches. Aim This study synthesized methodological framew...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
b21f46ac-311d-5833-a54c-2ae4ba2cdbea
DOI
10.12688/f1000research.174745.1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Mapping Methodology to Identify Research Gaps and Priorities in Existing Scoping Reviews - A Scoping ReviewDOI 10.12688/f1000research.174745.1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.