Back to search

Article

Inclusion, characteristics and credibility of systematic reviews in doctoral theses: A cross-sectional study of all Medical Faculties in Sweden

2024-06-11

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Objective</h4> Systematic reviews (SRs) are essential to ensure that decisions are informed by an up-to-date and complete understanding of the relevant research evidence. Conducting SRs within a doctoral thesis can reduce redundant, harmful and unethical research, identify knowledge gaps, and help the doctoral student obtain important skills to conduct and use research. The output and learning process of SRs o...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
5bdc026c-eff7-52ed-8d43-3a75aab58bbc
DOI
10.1101/2024.06.11.24307851
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Inclusion, characteristics and credibility of systematic reviews in doctoral theses: A cross-sectional study of all Medical Faculties in SwedenDOI 10.1101/2024.06.11.24307851
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.